Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between Grok 3 (xAI) and
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) comes down to three things:
per-token pricing, context window, and which capability matters most for your workload.
Grok 3 costs $3.00/M input vs
$3.00/M for Claude Sonnet 4.6;
context windows are 1.0M vs
200K tokens. Detailed breakdown below.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Grok 3 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|
| Provider | xAI | Anthropic |
|---|
| Released | 2025-02-17 | 2026-03-12 |
|---|
| Input price |
$3.00/M |
$3.00/M |
| Output price |
$15.00/M |
$15.00/M |
| Cached input |
— |
$0.3000/M |
| Context window |
1.0M |
200K |
| Max output |
16K |
64K |
| Modalities |
text image |
text image |
| Tokenizer |
grok |
claude-3 |
Capability matrix
| Capability | Grok 3 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|
| function calling |
Yes |
Yes |
| json mode |
Yes |
Yes |
| vision |
Yes |
Yes |
| streaming |
Yes |
Yes |
| realtime web |
Yes |
No |
| tool use |
No |
Yes |
Benchmark comparison
Higher is better for all benchmarks shown.
Per-call cost on typical workloads
| Workload (in/out tokens) | Grok 3 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Cheaper by |
|---|
| Standard chat (1K / 500) |
$0.010500 |
$0.010500 |
Tied |
| RAG (4K / 500) |
$0.019500 |
$0.019500 |
Tied |
| Long doc (20K / 1K) |
$0.075000 |
$0.075000 |
Tied |
| Very long context (100K / 2K) |
$0.322500 |
$0.322500 |
Tied |
When to choose Grok 3 over Claude Sonnet 4.6
- Larger context window (1.0M vs 200K) — relevant when whole documents or long histories must fit in a single call.
- Supports realtime web — Claude Sonnet 4.6 does not.
When to choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 over Grok 3
- Supports tool use — Grok 3 does not.
Related comparisons