Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o Mini: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic) and
GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI) comes down to three things:
per-token pricing, context window, and which capability matters most for your workload.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input vs
$0.15/M for GPT-4o Mini;
context windows are 200K vs
128K tokens. Detailed breakdown below.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
|---|
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2024-07-18 |
|---|
| Input price |
$3.00/M |
$0.15/M |
| Output price |
$15.00/M |
$0.60/M |
| Cached input |
$0.3000/M |
$0.0750/M |
| Context window |
200K |
128K |
| Max output |
8K |
16K |
| Modalities |
text image |
text image |
| Tokenizer |
claude-3 |
o200k_base |
Capability matrix
| Capability | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|
| function calling |
Yes |
Yes |
| json mode |
Yes |
Yes |
| vision |
Yes |
Yes |
| streaming |
Yes |
Yes |
| tool use |
Yes |
No |
Per-call cost on typical workloads
| Workload (in/out tokens) | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GPT-4o Mini | Cheaper by |
|---|
| Standard chat (1K / 500) |
$0.010500 |
$0.000450 |
GPT-4o Mini by $0.010050 |
| RAG (4K / 500) |
$0.019500 |
$0.000900 |
GPT-4o Mini by $0.018600 |
| Long doc (20K / 1K) |
$0.075000 |
$0.003600 |
GPT-4o Mini by $0.071400 |
| Very long context (100K / 2K) |
$0.322500 |
$0.015900 |
GPT-4o Mini by $0.306600 |
When to choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet over GPT-4o Mini
- Larger context window (200K vs 128K) — relevant when whole documents or long histories must fit in a single call.
- Supports tool use — GPT-4o Mini does not.
When to choose GPT-4o Mini over Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- Per-token input cost is 95% lower than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
Related comparisons