GPT-4o vs Qwen3-Coder-480B: Detailed Comparison
Choosing between GPT-4o (OpenAI) and
Qwen3-Coder-480B (Alibaba) comes down to three things:
per-token pricing, context window, and which capability matters most for your workload.
GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input vs
$2.00/M for Qwen3-Coder-480B;
context windows are 128K vs
1.0M tokens. Detailed breakdown below.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | GPT-4o | Qwen3-Coder-480B |
|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
|---|
| Released | 2024-05-13 | 2025-07-22 |
|---|
| Input price |
$2.50/M |
$2.00/M |
| Output price |
$10.00/M |
$6.00/M |
| Cached input |
$1.2500/M |
— |
| Context window |
128K |
1.0M |
| Max output |
16K |
66K |
| Modalities |
text image audio |
text |
| Tokenizer |
o200k_base |
qwen |
Capability matrix
| Capability | GPT-4o | Qwen3-Coder-480B |
|---|
| function calling |
Yes |
Yes |
| json mode |
Yes |
Yes |
| vision |
Yes |
No |
| streaming |
Yes |
Yes |
| audio |
Yes |
No |
| code |
No |
Yes |
| tool use |
No |
Yes |
Benchmark comparison
Higher is better for all benchmarks shown.
Per-call cost on typical workloads
| Workload (in/out tokens) | GPT-4o | Qwen3-Coder-480B | Cheaper by |
|---|
| Standard chat (1K / 500) |
$0.007500 |
$0.005000 |
Qwen3-Coder-480B by $0.002500 |
| RAG (4K / 500) |
$0.015000 |
$0.011000 |
Qwen3-Coder-480B by $0.004000 |
| Long doc (20K / 1K) |
$0.060000 |
$0.046000 |
Qwen3-Coder-480B by $0.014000 |
| Very long context (100K / 2K) |
$0.265000 |
$0.209000 |
Qwen3-Coder-480B by $0.056000 |
When to choose GPT-4o over Qwen3-Coder-480B
- Supports vision — Qwen3-Coder-480B does not.
- Supports audio — Qwen3-Coder-480B does not.
When to choose Qwen3-Coder-480B over GPT-4o
- Per-token input cost is 20% lower than GPT-4o.
- Larger context window (1.0M vs 128K).
- Supports code — GPT-4o does not.
- Supports tool use — GPT-4o does not.
Related comparisons